What happens when you die?
The Bible answers this less often, and less consistently, than many people expect.
The question
This is the question the whole subject is usually assumed to be about, and it is the one the texts are least willing to answer directly.
What follows is not a survey of what people hope. It is what the documents actually say, which turns out to be several different things, in a rough order, over many centuries.
Read this question as
Everything below, in the order it was written.
Showing every passage.
What the texts say, in order
Known. Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.
Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.
For most of the Hebrew Bible, death is the end of knowing
The text. What the biblical texts themselves state. That a text says something is a fact about the text, and separate from whether it describes an event.
Ecclesiastes is blunt about it. "The living know that they will die, but the dead don’t know anything, neither do they have any more a reward; for their memory is forgotten." Their love and hatred and envy have perished. There is "no work, nor plan, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in Sheol, where you are going".
Sheol is not hell and it is not heaven. It is where everyone goes, and the texts say little about what happens there. A psalm makes it a reason to be spared: "For in death there is no memory of you. In Sheol, who shall give you thanks?" Where the dead do speak, as the departed spirits who rise to meet the fallen king of Babylon in Isaiah, it is to ask "Have you also become as weak as we are?"
Resurrection appears late, under persecution
The text. What the biblical texts themselves state. That a text says something is a fact about the text, and separate from whether it describes an event.
Daniel, which modern scholarship dates to the persecution under Antiochus IV in the 160s BCE, says plainly what almost nothing before it says: "Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt." The nearest parallel, in Isaiah, promises "Your dead shall live". Daniel goes further and raises the wicked as well.
By the first century this was a live dispute inside Judaism rather than a settled doctrine. Acts reports it as a fault line a defendant could set a courtroom arguing along: "the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, nor angel, nor spirit; but the Pharisees confess all of these". Christianity emerges from the side that affirmed it, and stakes everything on a particular instance of it.
5 sources for this passage. Show them.
- Daniel 12, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- The function of Daniel 1 in a second century BCE historical contextH. J. M. van Deventer, The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 7(2) · 2011
- The origin of the resurrection idea: A dialogue with George NickelsburgP. J. W. Schutte, HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 64(2) · 2008
- Isaiah 26, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- Acts 23, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
What Paul describes is a body, and an odd one
The text. What the biblical texts themselves state. That a text says something is a fact about the text, and separate from whether it describes an event.
Paul puts the question in an objector’s mouth, "How are the dead raised?" and "With what kind of body do they come?", and does not answer that the soul survives. He answers with a transformation of the body: "The body is sown perishable; it is raised imperishable", and "It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body".
What is raised is not flesh and blood brought back, since "flesh and blood can’t inherit God’s Kingdom", and not a spirit without a body, since it is still "a spiritual body". What the passage rules out is a version often assumed, in which the body is the disposable part.
One source for this passage. Show it.
Where the popular picture came from
Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.
Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.
Where the popular picture came from
Scholarship. A reading or reconstruction argued among the people who work on it, where the evidence allows more than one conclusion.
The familiar image of an immortal soul leaving the body at death and going somewhere is not the dominant biblical picture. It is not absent either. In Matthew, Jesus warns against fearing "those who kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul", and the Wisdom of Solomon, which the Catholic canon includes and the Westminster Confession’s leaves out, says "the souls of the righteous are in the hand of God". Plato’s Phaedo, in the fourth century BCE, had already concluded that "the soul is immortal and imperishable, and our souls will truly exist in another world". Greek beliefs about what survives death are a separate tradition with its own history, and the volume cited here is about how that tradition and Christian resurrection belief met.
How much of later Christian teaching about the afterlife is inheritance from that encounter, and how much is development of something already in the texts, is a real scholarly argument rather than a settled account. What the texts do show is that the two strands are distinguishable, and the churches have joined them in different ways.
8 sources for this passage. Show them.
- The Possibility of Immortal Flesh, in Greek Resurrection Beliefs and the Success of ChristianityDag Øistein Endsjø, Palgrave Macmillan · 2009
- The origin of the resurrection idea: A dialogue with George NickelsburgP. J. W. Schutte, HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 64(2) · 2008
- Matthew 10, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- Wisdom of Solomon 3, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 120 to 130: the canon of ScriptureLibreria Editrice Vaticana
- The Westminster Confession of Faith, chapters 1, 32 and 33: of scripture, of the state of men after death, of the last judgmentOrthodox Presbyterian Church · 1647
- Phaedo, translated by Benjamin JowettPlato, Project Gutenberg
- PlatoRichard Kraut, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
What the churches actually teach
Traditions differ. A point on which Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant traditions teach differently, described without picking between them.
Christian traditions differ substantially here. They differ on whether the dead are conscious before the resurrection: Seventh-day Adventists teach that until then "death is an unconscious state for all people". They differ on hell: "eternal torments" in the Westminster Confession, "definitive self-exclusion from communion with God" in the Catholic Catechism, which also affirms its eternity, and for Adventists an end, when "fire from God will consume" the wicked. And they differ on purgatory, which the Catholic Church teaches as a purification after death for those who die "still imperfectly purified". The Westminster Confession settles two of those questions in one paragraph. It has souls that “neither die nor sleep” going straight to heaven or to hell, and then closes the door: “besides these two places, for souls separated from their bodies, the Scripture acknowledgeth none.” That is a denial of purgatory written as an inventory.
The Nicene creed commits to strikingly little. It says Christ “shall come again, with glory, to judge the quick and the dead”, and it ends “I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come”. On this subject that is the whole of it. Almost everything in the popular picture is elaboration on top of that, from various centuries.
6 sources for this passage. Show them.
- The Nicene CreedChristian Classics Ethereal Library · 381
- The Westminster Confession of Faith, chapters 1, 32 and 33: of scripture, of the state of men after death, of the last judgmentOrthodox Presbyterian Church · 1647
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 1033 to 1037: hellLibreria Editrice Vaticana
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 1030 to 1032: the final purification, or purgatoryLibreria Editrice Vaticana
- Fundamental Belief 26: Death and ResurrectionSeventh-day Adventist Church, North American Division
- Fundamental Belief 27: The Millennium and the End of SinSeventh-day Adventist Church, North American Division
Sheol is not a destination. It is the absence of one.
What nobody has information about
Unknown. Humanity does not currently have a satisfactory answer.
Humanity does not currently have a satisfactory answer.
Everything after the last measurable moment
Open. A question no research, historical or scientific or theological, has resolved to general agreement.
Nothing about this is accessible to investigation, and the things sometimes offered as evidence do not reach it. Accounts reported by people who were resuscitated are accounts from people who came back, which is the only kind of account there could be. They are real experiences and they are evidence about dying, not about being dead.
So the honest statement is that no one has information that could be checked.
What is actually claimed
Possible. A hypothesis or interpretation worth examining, but not an established fact.
A hypothesis or interpretation worth examining, but not an established fact.
What the creed claims, exactly
Belief. A claim of faith about God, salvation, revelation or the resurrection. Held by Christians as true; not the kind of claim historical method is able to settle either way.
The creed’s claim is not that a part of you is naturally indestructible. It is that the dead are raised, by God, as an act rather than a property, and that this has happened once already as the pattern for it.
The difference matters. An immortal soul survives death by its nature. A resurrection is something done to a person who genuinely died. The Catholic Church and the Westminster Confession teach both, a soul that does not perish and a body raised at the end; Adventists hold that God "alone is immortal" and teach only the second. What the creed commits a church to is the resurrection, which is a stranger and more specific thing to believe.
4 sources for this passage. Show them.
- 1 Corinthians 15, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 355 to 384: manLibreria Editrice Vaticana
- The Westminster Confession of Faith, chapters 1, 32 and 33: of scripture, of the state of men after death, of the last judgmentOrthodox Presbyterian Church · 1647
- Fundamental Belief 26: Death and ResurrectionSeventh-day Adventist Church, North American Division
Why the question resists being left alone
Open. A question no research, historical or scientific or theological, has resolved to general agreement.
People do not usually arrive at a view here by reading Daniel. They arrive at it at a funeral. That is worth stating, because the arguments on all sides tend to be conducted as though the stakes were intellectual.
This site has no standing to tell you what happens. It can tell you that the texts say less than is usually claimed for them, that what they do say is more interesting than the popular version, and that the confident answers in both directions are reaching past the evidence.
The evidence
Primary research, scientific institutions and archives. Links open at the publisher.
- The Nicene CreedChristian Classics Ethereal Library · 381
- The Westminster Confession of Faith, chapters 1, 32 and 33: of scripture, of the state of men after death, of the last judgmentOrthodox Presbyterian Church · 1647
- Ecclesiastes 9, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- Daniel 12, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- 1 Corinthians 15, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- The Possibility of Immortal Flesh, in Greek Resurrection Beliefs and the Success of ChristianityDag Øistein Endsjø, Palgrave Macmillan · 2009
- Acts 23, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- Psalm 6, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- Isaiah 14, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- Isaiah 26, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- The function of Daniel 1 in a second century BCE historical contextH. J. M. van Deventer, The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 7(2) · 2011
- The origin of the resurrection idea: A dialogue with George NickelsburgP. J. W. Schutte, HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 64(2) · 2008
- Matthew 10, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- Wisdom of Solomon 3, World English BibleeBible.org, public domain
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 120 to 130: the canon of ScriptureLibreria Editrice Vaticana
- Phaedo, translated by Benjamin JowettPlato, Project Gutenberg
- PlatoRichard Kraut, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 1030 to 1032: the final purification, or purgatoryLibreria Editrice Vaticana
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 1033 to 1037: hellLibreria Editrice Vaticana
- Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 355 to 384: manLibreria Editrice Vaticana
- Fundamental Belief 26: Death and ResurrectionSeventh-day Adventist Church, North American Division
- Fundamental Belief 27: The Millennium and the End of SinSeventh-day Adventist Church, North American Division
The questions that do not close
Where history stops being the right instrument, and says so rather than guessing.
06 of 10This question is stop 6 of 10 on The questions that do not close, a route through the Ocean of Faith.Where this question leads
- Ocean of FaithWhere did hell come from?Shared ground: christianity and afterlife.Deepdepth, meaning: Major unanswered questions.Read
- Ocean of FaithWhat happened after the crucifixion?Shared ground: christianity and resurrection.Abyssdepth, meaning: Fundamental questions where our understanding is extremely limited.Read
- Ocean of FaithWhy does a good God allow suffering?Shared ground: christianity.Abyssdepth, meaning: Fundamental questions where our understanding is extremely limited.Read
- Ocean of MindWhy does anything feel like anything?Abyssdepth, meaning: Fundamental questions where our understanding is extremely limited.Read