Skip to content
Back to the Ocean of Faith

Evidence record

Ocean of Faith: routes, readings and dates

Everything the ocean’s page says outside its questions, claim by claim. A chronology entry stands on the sources of the question it points to; a translation reading is checked word for word against the translation it names.

If something here is wrong, misquoted or unfair, write to support@unknownoceans.com and give the claim number, which does not change.

The ocean

Claim: What can be shown, and what is believed?

Kind
Framing. Signposting. It asserts nothing a source could check.

Claim: Christianity as history and as living faith: the texts, the evidence, the institutions, and the line between what can be established and what is held.

Kind
Framing. Signposting. It asserts nothing a source could check.

The routes

Claim: What can be shown

Kind
Framing. Signposting. It asserts nothing a source could check.

Claim: Start with the evidence and follow it until it runs out, which it does, in a specific place.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

A description of the route’s design, not a claim about the sources.

Claim 4 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: The man himself

Kind
Framing. Signposting. It asserts nothing a source could check.

Claim: What can be established about one first-century Galilean,

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    Is rewritten Bible/Scripture the solution to the Synoptic Problem?p. 6, dating tables

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: 30 CE Jesus in Galilee

    Both schemes Malan tabulates place Jesus’s activity in Galilee in the decades up to 30 CE.

  • Supports · English, tr. Church and Brodribb

    The Annals, Book 15, chapter 44Annals 15.44

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus

What this does not establish

That he taught in Galilee is the Gospels’ account, which Malan’s tables adopt; Tacitus gives the reign and the governor, not the region.

Claim 6 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: and where the establishing stops.

Kind
Framing. Signposting. It asserts nothing a source could check.

Claim: Where the book came from

Kind
Framing. Signposting. It asserts nothing a source could check.

Claim: Four Gospels that never name their writers,

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    Luke 1, World English BibleMatthew 1-28, Mark 1-16, Luke 1-24 and John 1-21, WEB (eBible.org), all 89 chapters, searched for "write", "wrote", "written" and "writing"

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The only places a Gospel speaks of its own writing are Luke 1:3 and John 21:24. Neither gives a name. Cited as Luke 1 because the other chapters are not in the evidence list.

  • Supports · WEB

    Luke 1, World English BibleLuke 1:3

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: it seemed good to me also, having traced the course of all things accurately from the first, to write to you in order, most excellent Theophilus;
  • Supports · WEB

    John 21, World English BibleJohn 21:20, 24

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: This is the disciple who testifies about these things, and wrote these things.

What this does not establish

That the texts name no writer is a fact about the texts. Whether that makes them anonymous in the ancient sense is argued, and the tradition named the writers early.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “Four anonymous Gospels,” "Anonymous" takes a side in a live argument; the Gospels page now says they "never name their writers", which is what the texts show. Raised by the authorship reviewer.

Claim 9 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: a canon no single council chose,

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (NPNF)

    Letter 39, for 367: the Festal Letter listing the canonical booksheading and section 5

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: (For 367.) ... These are, the four Gospels , according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

    The earliest list of the twenty-seven is a bishop’s letter, not a council’s decree.

  • Supports · English (NPNF)

    The Code of Canons of the African Church, canon 24: the canonical Scripturescanon 24

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: for these are the things which we have received from our fathers to be read in church.

    The African councils enacted a list, and say they were receiving it.

What this does not establish

Councils did adopt lists: the African councils for their churches, and Trent in 1546 for the Catholic Church, with an anathema. What no single council did was create the list for everyone.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “a canon nobody voted on,” The African councils enacted canon 24 and Trent defined the Catholic list, so "nobody voted" overcorrects the popular story. Raised by the canon reviewer, whose wording is adopted.

Claim 10 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: and a text you can check against a fourth-century page.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    Codex Sinaiticus: the manuscriptAbout Codex Sinaiticus, first page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Codex Sinaiticus, a manuscript of the Christian Bible written in the middle of the fourth century, contains the earliest complete copy of the Christian New Testament.
  • Supports

    Codex Sinaiticus: the history of the manuscript and of the projectproject overview (/en/project/), read with the history page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Images of every leaf were taken under evenly distributed ('standard') lighting ... The website is the main medium for making Codex Sinaiticus accessible.

What this does not establish

The date is palaeographic.

Claim 11 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: How it became an institution

Kind
Framing. Signposting. It asserts nothing a source could check.

Claim: From an illegal association in one province to an empire, a creed and, eventually, several churches.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

A summary of the route’s arc, from Pliny’s province to Nicaea, the papacy and the separated churches.

  • Context · English (Internet History Sourcebooks)

    Pliny on the Christians: Letters 10.96 and 10.97, in EnglishLetters 10.96

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Even this, they affirmed, they had ceased to do after my edict by which, in accordance with your instructions, I had forbidden political associations.

What this does not establish

Pliny’s province is where the ban is documented, not the only place the movement was. The line compresses three centuries.

Claim 13 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: What it did

Kind
Framing. Signposting. It asserts nothing a source could check.

Claim: The record of an institution with power, in the order the documents allow,

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

A description of the route’s design.

Claim 15 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: including the parts it commissioned itself.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

The John Jay study is the clearest case on the route: the United States bishops commissioned it. Other records on the route are state inquiries or the church’s own documents.

Claim 16 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: The questions that do not close

Kind
Framing. Signposting. It asserts nothing a source could check.

Claim: Where history stops being the right instrument, and says so rather than guessing.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

The page’s own account of what the route is for.

Claim 18 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

The translation readings

Claim: The Greek gynaikes covers both women and wives.

Kind
About a word. What a word in the original language means, or how it is translated.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

The marks on the King James and Young’s renderings were moved from "your women" to "women" for the same reason.

  • Supports · English (LSJ)

    gyne, in A Greek-English Lexicon (Liddell, Scott and Jones)γυνή, I and II

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: woman, opp. man, Il.15.683 , etc. ... II. wife, spouse, Il.6.160
  • Supports · Greek (SBLGNT, with its apparatus)

    1 Corinthians 14, SBL Greek New Testament1 Corinthians 14:34

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Αἱ ⸀γυναῖκες ‡ γυναῖκες WH Treg NA28 ] + ὑμῶν RP ἐν ταῖς ἐκκλησίαις σιγάτωσαν,

    The apparatus records that the Robinson-Pierpont text adds ὑμῶν, "your".

What this does not establish

LSJ is a lexicon of classical Greek. The Textus Receptus, which the King James translates, reads Αἱ γυναῖκες ὑμῶν, "your women" (checked on eBible, grctr); the critical text has no "your". That is a difference of Greek text, not of translation, so the comparison now marks only the word.

Claim 66 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: One of these is a rule about half a congregation. The other is a rule about a marriage.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

Verse 35’s "their own husbands" is what a reading of wives leans on.

  • Context · WEB

    1 Corinthians 14:34, World English Bible1 Corinthians 14:35

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Let them ask their own husbands at home, for it is shameful for a wife to be talking in the assembly.

Claim 67 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · KJV

    1 Corinthians 14:34, King James Versionverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.

Claim 68 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Your women in the assemblies let them be silent, for it hath not been permitted to them to speak, but to be subject, as also the law saith;

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · YLT

    1 Corinthians 14:34, Young's Literal Translationverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Your women in the assemblies let them be silent, for it hath not been permitted to them to speak, but to be subject, as also the law saith;

Claim 69 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: let the women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but let them be in subjection, as also saith the law.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · ASV

    1 Corinthians 14:34, American Standard Versionverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: let the women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but let them be in subjection, as also saith the law.

Claim 70 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Let the wives be quiet in the assemblies, for it has not been permitted for them to be talking except in submission, as the law also says,

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    1 Corinthians 14:34, World English Bibleverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Let the wives be quiet in the assemblies, for it has not been permitted for them to be talking except in submission, as the law also says,

Claim 71 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: One person, greeted once.

Kind
Describes a Bible passage. What a biblical passage says, in this page’s words. A fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    Romans 16:7, World English BibleRomans 16:7; the WEB New Testament, all 260 chapters, searched for "Junia"

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Greet Andronicus and Junia, my relatives and my fellow prisoners, who are notable among the apostles, who were also in Christ before me.

    The name occurs once in the New Testament.

Claim 72 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Surviving Greek usage attests the woman’s name, Junia.

Kind
What scholars argue. A report of what specialists argue, or where they disagree.
Review
Partly checked. Only part of the source could be read. What was not read is listed.

What this does not establish

Read from abstracts; the databases and counts were not seen.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “Junias is unattested anywhere else in antiquity.” Neither source the women page cites says Junias is unattested; Belleville’s abstract says usage confirms the feminine. Raised by the women reviewer.

Claim 73 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: From the nineteenth century the man, Junias, displaced her, on the hypothesis that the name was a shortened one.

Kind
What scholars argue. A report of what specialists argue, or where they disagree.
Review
Partly checked. Only part of the source could be read. What was not read is listed.

What this does not establish

Read from abstracts. Hartmann also traces male readings earlier, to Luther and others; the nineteenth century is when she says the woman disappeared from the text. Whether the Greek editions have fully changed back is flagged on the women page.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “One person, greeted once, whose name changed sex in 1901 and changed back.” 1901 is contradicted by the renderings printed under it: Young’s had Junias in 1862. The sources date the change to the nineteenth century (Hartmann) and the masculine accent in the Greek editions to 1927 to 2001 (Belleville); "changed back" is flagged on the women page. Raised by the women reviewer.

Claim 74 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · KJV

    Romans 16:7, King James Versionverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.

Claim 75 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: salute Andronicus and Junias, my kindred, and my fellow-captives, who are of note among the apostles, who also have been in Christ before me.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · YLT

    Romans 16:7, Young's Literal Translationverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: salute Andronicus and Junias, my kindred, and my fellow-captives, who are of note among the apostles, who also have been in Christ before me.

Claim 76 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Salute Andronicus and Junias, my kinsmen, and my fellow-prisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also have been in Christ before me.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · ASV

    Romans 16:7, American Standard Versionverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Salute Andronicus and Junias, my kinsmen, and my fellow-prisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also have been in Christ before me.

Claim 77 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Greet Andronicus and Junia, my relatives and my fellow prisoners, who are notable among the apostles, who were also in Christ before me.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    Romans 16:7, World English Bibleverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Greet Andronicus and Junia, my relatives and my fellow prisoners, who are notable among the apostles, who were also in Christ before me.

Claim 78 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Here they agree,

Kind
About a word. What a word in the original language means, or how it is translated.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · KJV

    Colossians 3:22, King James VersionColossians 3:22

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh;
  • Supports · YLT

    Colossians 3:22, Young's Literal TranslationColossians 3:22

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The servants! obey in all things those who are masters according to the flesh,
  • Supports · ASV

    Colossians 3:22, American Standard VersionColossians 3:22

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Servants, obey in all things them that are your masters according to the flesh;
  • Supports · WEB

    Colossians 3:22, World English BibleColossians 3:22

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Servants, obey in all things those who are your masters according to the flesh,

Claim 79 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: which is the more interesting result.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

Agreement across four centuries is itself a decision, which the next sentence explains.

Claim 80 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: The word is douloi, the ordinary Greek word for slaves,

Kind
About a word. What a word in the original language means, or how it is translated.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · Greek (SBLGNT)

    Colossians 3, SBL Greek New TestamentColossians 3:22

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: οἱ δοῦλοι, ὑπακούετε κατὰ πάντα τοῖς κατὰ σάρκα κυρίοις,
  • Supports · English (LSJ)

    doulos, in A Greek-English Lexicon (Liddell, Scott and Jones)δοῦλος (A), I

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: born bondman or slave, opp. one made a slave ... then, generally, bondman, slave

What this does not establish

LSJ is a lexicon of classical Greek.

Claim 81 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: and four centuries of English print servants without a footnote between them.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · KJV

    Colossians 3:22, King James VersionColossians 3, the whole eBible page with its notes

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    No footnote on the page.

  • Supports · YLT

    Colossians 3:22, Young's Literal TranslationColossians 3, the whole eBible page with its notes

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    No footnote on the page.

  • Supports · ASV

    Colossians 3:22, American Standard VersionColossians 3, the whole eBible page with its notes

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    No footnote on the page.

  • Supports · WEB

    Colossians 3:22, World English BibleColossians 3, the whole eBible page with its notes

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    No footnote on the page.

What this does not establish

What the eBible pages print; printed editions of the King James carried marginal notes this edition does not reproduce.

Claim 82 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: One modern preface defends a range of renderings, from slave to servant, because the word covered a range of relationships.

Kind
What scholars argue. A report of what specialists argue, or where they disagree.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    Preface to the English Standard Version: translation philosophyTranslation Philosophy

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: These terms, however, actually cover a range of relationships that requires a range of renderings–“slave,” “bondservant,” or “servant”–depending on the context.

    The preface’s dashes are em dashes, recorded as en dashes.

What this does not establish

The ESV’s own reasoning; the translations page reports it alongside the lexicon.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “” The decision gave the lexicon’s side only; the ESV preface’s counter-argument, which the translations page cites, applies here. Raised by the translations reviewer.

Claim 83 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God:

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · KJV

    Colossians 3:22, King James Versionverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God:

Claim 84 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: The servants! obey in all things those who are masters according to the flesh, not in eye-service as men-pleasers, but in simplicity of heart, fearing God;

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · YLT

    Colossians 3:22, Young's Literal Translationverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The servants! obey in all things those who are masters according to the flesh, not in eye-service as men-pleasers, but in simplicity of heart, fearing God;

Claim 85 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Servants, obey in all things them that are your masters according to the flesh; not with eye-service, as men-pleasers, but in singleness of heart, fearing the Lord:

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · ASV

    Colossians 3:22, American Standard Versionverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Servants, obey in all things them that are your masters according to the flesh; not with eye-service, as men-pleasers, but in singleness of heart, fearing the Lord:

Claim 86 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Servants, obey in all things those who are your masters according to the flesh, not just when they are looking, as men pleasers, but in singleness of heart, fearing God.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    Colossians 3:22, World English Bibleverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Servants, obey in all things those who are your masters according to the flesh, not just when they are looking, as men pleasers, but in singleness of heart, fearing God.

Claim 87 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: A deadline or a description, depending on one word.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

Genea read as "generation" sets a time; read as "people" or "race" it describes who will last. The generation page argues the choice.

Claim 88 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Only one of the four admits that a choice was made, and it does it in a footnote.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    Mark 13:30, World English BibleMark 13:30, footnote

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The word translated “generation” (genea) could also be translated “race”, “family”, or “people”.
  • Supports · KJV

    Mark 13:30, King James VersionMark 13, the whole eBible page with its notes

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    No footnote.

  • Supports · YLT

    Mark 13:30, Young's Literal TranslationMark 13, the whole eBible page with its notes

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    No footnote.

  • Supports · ASV

    Mark 13:30, American Standard VersionMark 13, the whole eBible page with its notes

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    No footnote.

Claim 89 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · KJV

    Mark 13:30, King James Versionverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.

Claim 90 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Verily I say to you, that this generation may not pass away till all these things may come to pass;

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · YLT

    Mark 13:30, Young's Literal Translationverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Verily I say to you, that this generation may not pass away till all these things may come to pass;

Claim 91 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, until all these things be accomplished.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · ASV

    Mark 13:30, American Standard Versionverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, until all these things be accomplished.

Claim 92 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Most certainly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things happen.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    Mark 13:30, World English Bibleverse as printed on the linked eBible page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Most certainly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things happen.

Claim 93 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: The word translated “generation” (genea) could also be translated “race”, “family”, or “people”.

Kind
Quotes a source. The words of a named text, checked against the source.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    Mark 13:30, World English BibleMark 13:30, footnote

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The word translated “generation” (genea) could also be translated “race”, “family”, or “people”.

Claim 94 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

The chronology

Claim: 3rd century BC to 1st century AD: The Qumran scrolls are copied, more than a thousand years before the oldest biblical manuscripts previously known.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

The range covers all the scrolls; individual scrolls are dated within it, mostly by handwriting.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “c. 200 BC and earlier: The Qumran scrolls are copied, a thousand years before any Hebrew Bible previously known.” The scrolls project dates them from the third century BC to the first century AD, which the exploration’s own timeline says; "c. 200 BC and earlier" put them all before the second century. The comparison is the project’s: "over a thousand years older than previously identified biblical manuscripts".

Claim 19 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Between 26 and 36: Jesus is crucified under Pontius Pilate, prefect of Judea in those years.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

The span is Pilate’s tenure. The year within it is argued: Hombana writes of 33, and 30 is a common convention that no source the execution page cites supports.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “c. AD 30: A Galilean teacher is crucified in Jerusalem under Pontius Pilate. The year is conventional.” Nothing the execution page cites gives 30; its sources give Pilate’s tenure, 26 to 36, and one of them 33. The date is now the span the sources carry. "Galilean" and "in Jerusalem" were not on that page and are dropped rather than sourced from elsewhere. Raised by the execution reviewer.

Claim 20 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 51

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

A scholarly estimate; the letter carries no date.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “c. 50” The exploration’s source dates 1 Thessalonians "around 51 CE".

Claim 21 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Paul tells Thessalonica that "we who are alive" will be caught up to meet the Lord.

Kind
Quotes the Bible. The words of a biblical text, in the translation named. That the text says it is a fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    1 Thessalonians 4, World English Bible1 Thessalonians 4:15, 17

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will in no way precede those who have fallen asleep. ... then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air.

What this does not establish

What Paul wrote. The exploration reads the "we" as placing him among the living, not as a promise that he would survive.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “Paul tells Thessalonica that "we who are alive" will see the Lord come.” Closer to the verse: Paul says the living will be caught up to meet the Lord in the air.

Claim 22 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 55

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “c. 50s” "c." and "50s" said approximate twice; the exploration’s source gives "ca. 55".

Claim 23 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Paul writes to Corinth, passing on a list of appearances he says he received rather than composed.

Kind
Describes a Bible passage. What a biblical passage says, in this page’s words. A fact about the text, separate from whether an event happened.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    1 Corinthians 15, World English Bible1 Corinthians 15:3-8

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve.

What this does not establish

"Rather than composed" is what "received" implies; the exploration’s sources treat verses 3 to 5 as a formula older than the letter.

Claim 24 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 69 to 100: Mark, Luke and Matthew are written, on Martin Hengel’s dating.

Kind
What scholars argue. A report of what specialists argue, or where they disagree.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

One scholar’s dates, reported by a reviewer who thought them if anything late. The exploration gives no date for John, and neither does this entry.

Other readings

Others date Luke into the second century; the exploration reports that too.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “c. 70 to 110: The four Gospels are written.” The authorship page dates only the first three, 69 to 100, from Hengel via Blomberg. 110 and the date of John had no source. Raised by the authorship reviewer.

Claim 25 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: None of the four Gospels names its writer.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · WEB

    Luke 1, World English BibleMatthew 1-28, Mark 1-16, Luke 1-24 and John 1-21, WEB (eBible.org), all 89 chapters, searched for "write", "wrote", "written" and "writing"

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    Only Luke 1:3 and John 21:24 speak of their own writing, and neither gives a name.

  • Supports · WEB

    Luke 1, World English BibleLuke 1:3

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: it seemed good to me also, having traced the course of all things accurately from the first, to write to you in order, most excellent Theophilus;
  • Supports · WEB

    John 21, World English BibleJohn 21:24

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: This is the disciple who testifies about these things, and wrote these things.

What this does not establish

The titles that name them are on the manuscripts, not in the texts. Whether that makes the books anonymous is argued.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “All four are anonymous.” "Anonymous" takes a side; the authorship page now says the Gospels "never name their writers". Raised by the authorship reviewer.

Claim 26 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 96: A letter from the church at Rome tells the church at Corinth that the presbyters it deposed could not justly be removed.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (ANF)

    The Letter to the Corinthians, traditionally ascribed to Clement of Rome1 Clement 1, 44, 47

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The church of God which sojourns at Rome , to the church of God sojourning at Corinth ... cannot be justly dismissed from the ministry. ... But we see that you have removed some men of excellent behaviour from the ministry, which they fulfilled blamelessly and with honour. ... engage in sedition against its presbyters.
  • Supports

    The Pope, in the Catholic Encyclopediasection II

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: In his "Epistle to the Corinthians" , written in 95 or 96,

What this does not establish

The date is conventional; the letter carries none.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “c. 96: A letter from the church at Rome tells the church at Corinth to reinstate the presbyters it deposed.” 1 Clement never says "reinstate"; it says such men "cannot be justly dismissed". The papacy page now reads the same. Raised by the papacy reviewer.

Claim 27 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 100: The Didache tells congregations how to baptise, and what to do if the water is the wrong temperature.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (ANF)

    The Didache, or The Teaching of the Twelve Apostlesch. 7

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: But if you have not living water, baptize into other water; and if you can not in cold, in warm.
  • Supports

    Didachesection on the date

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The commoner view is that which puts the Didache before 100.

What this does not establish

About 100 is a middle estimate, from a 1908 encyclopedia; the next sentence gives the range.

Claim 28 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Estimates of its date run from before 70 to the fourth century.

Kind
What scholars argue. A report of what specialists argue, or where they disagree.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    Didachesection on the date

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Sabatier, Minasi, Jacquier, and others have preferred a date even before 70.
  • Supports

    Didachebibliography

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Dr. Bigg ( ibid ., VI, April, 1905) places the Didache in the fourth century.

What this does not establish

The survey is the encyclopedia’s, of 1908. Later scholarship was not read here.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “” "c. 100" is a contested middle estimate, and the only source is a 1908 encyclopedia. The range is now on the page. Raised by the earliest-Christians reviewer.

Claim 29 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 112: Pliny asks Trajan what to do about Christians, and describes them singing to Christ as to a god.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · Latin

    Letters, Book 10, Letter 96: to the Emperor Trajan, concerning ChristiansLetters 10.96.7

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: quod essent soliti stato die ante lucem convenire , carmenque Christo quasi deo dicere secum invicem
  • Supports · English (Internet History Sourcebooks)

    Pliny on the Christians: Letters 10.96 and 10.97, in Englishheadnote and Letters 10.96

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Pliny the Younger was governor of Pontus/Bithynia from 111-113 AD. ... It is my practice, my lord, to refer to you all matters concerning which I am in doubt.

What this does not establish

Pliny reports what people who had left the movement told him.

Claim 30 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: After 110: Tacitus explains the name Christian to Roman readers, in a sentence about a fire.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (Church and Brodribb)

    The Annals, Book 15, chapter 44Annals 15.44

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: the conflagration was the result of an order. Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty
  • Supports · Spanish

    Reseña de: Williams, Margaret H., Early Classical Authors on Jesuspp. 249 to 250

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: «paganos» sobre Jesús en el siglo I y su escasez en el segundo ... Con buen criterio, Williams aborda los testimonios de forma cronológica.

    No pagan testimony in the first century; Williams takes Pliny (about 110) first, then Tacitus.

  • Supports · Spanish

    Reseña de: Williams, Margaret H., Early Classical Authors on Jesusp. 250

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Plinio el Joven, envió a Trajano ca. 110 ... El capítulo 4 («Tacitus’s Testimony for ‘Jesus’: Authentic or Interpolated?»)

What this does not establish

The sources read place Tacitus after Pliny’s letter without giving a year. About 116 is often given for this book of the Annals, but no source here states it.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “c. 116” The ancient-world page’s register found no source for 116; its sources place Tacitus after Pliny’s letter of about 110.

Claim 31 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 144: Marcion proposes cutting the Hebrew scriptures out of Christianity. The church refuses.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    Marcionites, in the Catholic Encyclopediaopening paragraph

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: They rejected the writings of the Old Testament and taught that Christ was not the Son of the God of the Jews
  • Supports

    Marcionites, in the Catholic Encyclopediaaccount of his career

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: His final breach with the Roman Church occurred in the autumn of 144

What this does not establish

The year is reckoned from the Marcionites’ own count of years since Christ. "The church refuses" compresses a breach with the church at Rome and a long argument after it; Marcion’s own churches lasted centuries.

Claim 32 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 155: Justin describes a Sunday gathering to an emperor,

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (ANF)

    The First Apology, chapter 67: the weekly worship of the Christianschs 1 and 67

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: To the Emperor Titus Ælius Adrianus Antoninus Pius Augustus Cæsar ... And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place
  • Supports

    St. Justin Martyrsection on the Apologies

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: From all of this we may conclude that the "Apology" was written somewhere between 153 and 155.
  • Supports

    Catechism of the Catholic Church, the liturgical celebration of the Eucharist§ 1345

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: St. Justin wrote to the pagan emperor Antoninus Pius (138-161) around the year 155

What this does not establish

The date is inferred from the Apology’s internal evidence, not stated in it.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “c. 155: Justin describes a Sunday morning to an emperor,” Justin names the day, not the hour; "morning" was not in the text. The date stands: the page it indexes dates the Apology from the Catholic Encyclopedia (153 to 155) and the Catechism ("around the year 155"), which answers the note that no source was found.

Claim 33 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: in enough detail to be minutes.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

The page’s characterisation of chapter 67, which gives the meeting in order.

  • Context · English (ANF)

    The First Apology, chapter 67: the weekly worship of the Christiansch. 67

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: then, when the reader has ceased, the president verbally instructs, and exhorts to the imitation of these good things. Then we all rise together and pray

Claim 34 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 160: Justin writes a dialogue with a Jew as with an outsider.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

The date is Barnard’s, as Roberts reports it. Whether Trypho was a real person is not settled.

Claim 35 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: Whatever the first century was, this is two things.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

Other readings

Roberts also reads Dialogue 47 as Justin still accepting, on conditions, followers of Jesus who kept the law.

Claim 36 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 180: Irenaeus names all four Gospels and attaches each to a person.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (ANF)

    Against Heresies, Book 3, Chapter 1Against Heresies 3.1.1

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Matthew also issued a written Gospel among the Hebrews in their own dialect, while Peter and Paul were preaching at Rome , and laying the foundations of the Church . After their departure, Mark, the disciple and interpreter of Peter, did also hand down to us in writing what had been preached by Peter.
  • Supports

    The Gospel of Matthew, John the elder and the Papias tradition: A response to R H Gundryp. 283

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The earliest unambiguous statement to this effect was made by Irenaeus around the year 180

What this does not establish

What Irenaeus says, not whether he was right.

Claim 37 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: c. 248: Origen tells a critic that Christians will not serve in the army, and fight for the emperor by praying instead.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (ANF, tr. Crombie)

    Against Celsus, Book 8, chapters 73 and 74Contra Celsum 8.73

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: And none fight better for the king than we do. We do not indeed fight under him, although he require it; but we fight on his behalf, forming a special army – an army of piety – by offering our prayers to God .
  • Supports

    Origen and Origenismsections on his life

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Born in 185, Origen was barely seventeen ... He was over sixty when he wrote his "Contra Celsum"

What this does not establish

The date is inferred: born 185, over sixty when he wrote, before the persecution of 250. The critic is Celsus, whose book Origen is answering.

Claim 38 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 313: Constantine and Licinius agree at Milan that Christians and everyone else may worship as they choose.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (ANF, tr. Fletcher)

    Of the Manner in Which the Persecutors Died, chapter 48: the text of the agreement at MilanOn the Deaths of the Persecutors 48

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: When we, Constantine and Licinius, emperors, had an interview at Milan ... it was proper that the Christians and all others should have liberty to follow that mode of religion which to each of them appeared best
  • Supports

    Constantine the GreatConstantine and Christianity

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: In 313 Licinius and he issued at Milan the famous joint edict of tolerance .

What this does not establish

Lactantius gives the text as Licinius published it at Nicomedia; the agreement was made at Milan.

Claim 39 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: By 324: Eusebius writes down which books are accepted, which are argued over, and which are out.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

324 is when the whole History was finished. The book with the list may be earlier, which "by" allows.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “c. 325: Eusebius writes down which books are accepted, which are argued over, and which are out.” McGiffert places the completion of the History in 324, and the books before it possibly by about 314. "c. 325" sat after Nicaea; the entry now precedes it.

Claim 40 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 325: Nicaea settles one word about the Son, and issues twenty canons, mostly about running an institution.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (NPNF, tr. Percival)

    The First Council of Nicaea: the creed and the twenty canonsThe Ecthesis

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: begotten ( γεννηθέντα ), not made, being of one substance ( ὁμοούσιον , consubstantialem) with the Father.
  • Supports · English (NPNF, tr. Percival)

    The First Council of Nicaea: the creed and the twenty canonsCanons 1 to 20, read in full

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Canon 20 Forasmuch as there are certain persons who kneel on the Lord's Day and in the days of Pentecost

    The canons end at 20 and deal with ordination, clergy and money, the movement of clergy, penance and discipline.

  • Supports

    First Council of Nicaea: its members and its surviving actsOpening and date

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The year 325 is accepted without hesitation as that of the First Council of Nicaea.

What this does not establish

"One word" compresses a dispute about the Son’s relation to the Father to the term the council used to answer it.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “and twenty canons about running an institution.” The Nicaea page says the canons are "largely" about running an institution; some concern penance and posture at prayer.

Claim 41 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: mid-4th century: Codex Sinaiticus is written. Its copy of Mark ends at chapter 16, verse 8.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    Codex Sinaiticus: the manuscriptAbout Codex Sinaiticus, first page

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Codex Sinaiticus, a manuscript of the Christian Bible written in the middle of the fourth century
  • Supports

    Pentecostal hermeneutical reconsideration of the longer ending of Mark 16:9–20p. 2

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The most important manuscripts end at 16:8, including the two most respected manuscripts (the 4th-century codex Sinaiticus

What this does not establish

The date is palaeographic, from the handwriting.

Claim 42 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 362: A letter preserved under Julian’s name orders hostels in every city, because no Jew ever has to beg and the Christians support "not only their own poor but ours as well".

Kind
Quotes a source. The words of a named text, checked against the source.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (Wright 1923)

    Letter 22, to Arsacius, high priest of GalatiaLetter 22, Wright’s heading

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: 22. To Arsacius, High-priest of Galatia [362, on his way to Antioch in June?]
  • Supports · English (Wright 1923)

    Letter 22, to Arsacius, high priest of GalatiaLetter 22

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: In every city establish frequent hostels in order that strangers may profit by our benevolence
  • Supports · English (Wright 1923)

    Letter 22, to Arsacius, high priest of GalatiaLetter 22

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: For it is disgraceful that, when no Jew ever has to beg, and the impious Galilaeans support not only their own poor but ours as well, all men see that our people lack aid from us.
  • Qualifies · French

    Deux fausses lettres de Julien l’Apostat (la lettre aux Juifs, Ep. 51 [Wright], et la lettre à Arsacius, Ep. 84 [Bidez])abstract

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Abstract only, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: À notre avis elle trahit la main d'un chrétien de la première moitié du cinquième siècle.

    Van Nuffelen (2002) argues the letter is a fifth-century Christian forgery.

What this does not establish

The year is Wright’s dating, with a query on the month. If Van Nuffelen is right, the letter is fifth-century and the date goes with it; he offered the case as enough to open the question.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “362: Julian orders hostels built in every city, because the Christians are feeding everyone and it is costing him converts.” The letter’s authenticity is challenged, and the charity page now says "preserved under his name". "Feeding everyone" and "costing him converts" were compressions; the entry now quotes the sentence and keeps the half about the Jews that the charity page turns on. Raised by the charity reviewer.

Claim 43 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 367: An Easter letter lists the twenty-seven books most New Testaments now contain.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Partly checked. Only part of the source could be read. What was not read is listed.
  • Supports · English (NPNF)

    Letter 39, for 367: the Festal Letter listing the canonical booksheading and section 5

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: (For 367.) ... These are, the four Gospels , according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Afterwards, the Acts of the Apostles and Epistles (called Catholic ), seven, viz. of James, one; of Peter, two; of John, three; after these, one of Jude. In addition, there are fourteen Epistles of Paul ... And besides, the Revelation of John.
  • Supports

    Canon Formation and Social Conflict in Fourth-Century Egypt: Athanasius of Alexandria’s Thirty-Ninth Festal Letterabstract

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Abstract only, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: the earliest extant Christian document to list precisely the twenty-seven books that eventually formed the generally accepted canon of the New Testament

What this does not establish

That these twenty-seven are what most New Testaments now contain rests on Brakke, read only as his abstract.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “367: An Easter letter lists the twenty-seven books of the New Testament.” Not every church’s New Testament is these twenty-seven; the canon reviewer’s wording is adopted.

Claim 44 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: It is the earliest surviving list of exactly those.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Partly checked. Only part of the source could be read. What was not read is listed.

What this does not establish

Brakke’s judgement, read from his abstract only.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “It is the earliest such list that survives.” Earlier lists survive; what Brakke says is earliest is a list of precisely the twenty-seven.

Claim 45 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 395: Jerome, defending himself, says he renders "sense for sense and not word for word", and in the same sentence exempts the holy scriptures.

Kind
Quotes a source. The words of a named text, checked against the source.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (NPNF)

    Letter 57, to Pammachius, on the best method of translatingheadnote and § 5

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Written to Pammachius (for whom see Letter LXVI.) in A.D. 395. ... For I myself not only admit but freely proclaim that in translating from the Greek (except in the case of the holy scriptures where even the order of the words is a mystery ) I render sense for sense and not word for word.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “395: Jerome, defending himself, states the whole problem of translation: "I render sense for sense and not word for word."” The same sentence exempts scripture, "where even the order of the words is a mystery", which the entry left out. Raised by the translations reviewer.

Claim 46 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 410 to 484: The church in Persia renounces subjection to Antioch and the western bishops, and a synod at Seleucia later affirms the Antiochene Christology.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    Nestorius and Nestorianismsection on Persia

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: At this time the Church in Persia was autonomous, having renounced all subjection to Antioch and the "Western" bishops at the Council of Seleucia in 410.
  • Supports

    Nestorius and Nestorianismsection on Persia

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: he excused himself from being present at Acacius's council in 484 at Seleucia , where twelve bishops were present. At this assembly, the Antiochene Christology was affirmed

What this does not establish

The source is a 1911 Catholic reference work, which names this church by a label the church itself rejects. It gives two council dates for what was a gradual separation.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “” The chronology had no entry for the church of the Persian empire, so its separations ran Chalcedon, 1054, 1517 as if they were the whole story. Raised by the denominations reviewer. The kinds page’s own wording ("later the Church of the East ... sets its own Christology") is flagged for review there, so this entry says only what the source read says.

Claim 47 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 418: Augustine writes to an officer that war may be waged only from necessity and only for peace.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (NPNF)

    Letter 189, to BonifaceLetter 189, heading and § 6

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Letter 189 (A.D. 418) ... Peace should be the object of your desire; war should be waged only as a necessity, and waged only that God may by it deliver men from the necessity and preserve them in peace.
  • Supports · English (NPNF)

    Letter 185, to Boniface: the editor’s headingeditor’s heading to Letter 185

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: A Letter of Augustine to Boniface, who, as we learn from Epistle 220, was Tribune, and afterwards Count in Africa.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “418: Augustine writes to a general” Boniface was a tribune, and only afterwards Count in Africa; the war page calls him an officer.

Claim 48 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: The just-war criteria that descend in part from him are still taught.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

"Still taught" rests on the Catholic catechism, which states the criteria; the war page also cites Lutheran, Reformed, Anglican and Russian Orthodox texts that allow war. Pope Francis wrote in 2020 that they are now very difficult to invoke.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “The doctrine that follows from it is still in use.” The war page says the criteria descend "in part" from Augustine (Baleng also names Cicero); "follows from it" said more.

Claim 49 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: By 426: Augustine argues with fellow Christians who doubt that the damned, or all of them, suffer forever, and gives a chapter to each form their view takes.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (NPNF)

    The City of God, Book 21, chapter 17: of those who fancy that no men shall be punished eternallyCity of God 21.17

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: I must now, I see, enter the lists of amicable controversy with those tender-hearted Christians who decline to believe that any, or that all of those whom the infallibly just Judge may pronounce worthy of the punishment of hell , shall suffer eternally
  • Supports · English (NPNF)

    The City of God, Book 21, chapter 17: of those who fancy that no men shall be punished eternallyCity of God 21.18 to 21.22, chapter headings

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Of Those Who Promise Impunity from All Sins Even to Heretics, Through Virtue of Their Participation of the Body of Christ. ... Of Those Who Promise This Indulgence Not to All, But Only to Those Who Have Been Baptized as Catholics, Though Afterwards They Have Broken Out into Many Crimes and Heresies. ... Of Those Who Assert that All Catholics Who Continue in the Faith Even Though by the Depravity of Their Lives They Have Merited Hell Fire, Shall Be Saved on Account of the Foundation Of Their Faith. ... Of Those Who Fancy that the Sins Which are Intermingled with Alms-Deeds Shall Not Be Charged at the Day of Judgment.

    Chapters 17 to 22 each take one form of the view; 23 to 27 answer them.

  • Supports

    The City of God, translator’s prefaceTranslator’s preface

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: It was begun the very year of Marcellinus’ death, a.d. 413, and was issued in detached portions from time to time, until its completion in the year 426.

What this does not establish

Book 21’s own year is not given; 426 is when the whole work was finished.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “c. 426: Augustine argues at length with the Christians of his own church who deny that hell is eternal, and records that there are many of them.” City of God 21.17 does not say there are many of them; it gives a chapter to each form of the view, which is the hell reviewer’s suggested wording. "Deny that hell is eternal" became what Augustine reports: they decline to believe that any, or that all, suffer eternally.

Claim 50 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 451: Chalcedon gives Constantinople privileges equal to Rome’s, ranked next after her, and says Rome had them "because it was the royal city". The Roman legates protest.

Kind
Quotes a source. The words of a named text, checked against the source.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

The canon speaks of "equal privileges" and of Constantinople ranking next after Rome; it reorders a hierarchy rather than levelling it.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “451: Chalcedon grants Constantinople the same privileges as Rome, on the grounds that Rome was the imperial city. The Roman legates protest.” The canon’s own word is "royal city", and it ranks Constantinople next after Rome. Raised by the papacy reviewer.

Claim 51 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 451: Chalcedon defines two natures in one person, and a substantial part of the church does not accept it.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports · English (NPNF, tr. Percival)

    The Council of Chalcedon: the definition of faith and the canonsDefinition of Faith

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: must be confessed to be in two natures , unconfusedly, immutably, indivisibly, inseparably [united]
  • Supports · English (NPNF, tr. Percival)

    The Council of Chalcedon: the definition of faith and the canonsActs, Session I

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Dioscorus, the most reverend Archbishop of Alexandria said, I receive the of two; the two I do not receive
  • Supports

    Orthodox Christianity in the 21st Centurysidebar

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: But Oriental Orthodoxy, which is considered “non-Chalcedonian,” teaches that Christ’s divine and human natures are unified, not separated.

What this does not establish

"Substantial" is not a number.

Claim 52 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 787: A council answers sixty years of imperial edicts against images with a distinction between two Greek words, one for the reverence due an image and one for the worship due to God alone. Iconoclasm returns in 815 and ends in 843.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    IconoclasmLeo III

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Beginning in 726, he issued a number of edicts against the icons and their veneration
  • Supports · English (NPNF, tr. Percival, with the Greek it prints)

    The Second Council of Nicaea: the decree on the holy imagesThe decree of 787

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: to these should be given due salutation and honourable reverence ( ἀσπασμὸν καὶ τιμητικὴν προσκύνησιν ), not indeed that true worship of faith ( λατρείαν ) which pertains alone to the divine nature
  • Supports

    The End of IconoclasmLeo V

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: In 815, Emperor Leo V the Armenian (r. 813–820) ordered the icons in the churches to be placed above the reach of the faithful
  • Supports

    The End of IconoclasmTheodora

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: on the first Sunday of Great Lent in that year–March 11, 843.
  • Context

    Iconoclasm, in the Catholic EncyclopediaIconoclasm in the west

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: held the synod of Frankfort (794) in the presence of two papal legates

    The west did not simply take the answer either: a Frankish synod condemned the council of 787.

What this does not establish

The 1910 encyclopedia gives 842 for the restoration; the OCA gives March 843. Brubaker, read in abstract by the pictures page, disputes how much was destroyed and how far it was an imperial initiative; that emperors issued edicts is not in question.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “787: A council settles a century of destroyed images with a distinction between two Greek words for reverence.” The council settled nothing: iconoclasm returned in 815 and ended in 843, and a Frankish synod condemned 787 in 794. It came sixty years after the first edicts, not a century, and "destroyed images" states a scale Brubaker disputes. Latreia is worship, not reverence. Raised by the icons reviewer.

Claim 53 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 1054: Roman legates and the Patriarch of Constantinople excommunicate each other.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    Common Declaration of Pope Paul VI and the Patriarch Athenagoras Iparagraph 2

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: in 1054 resulted in the sentence of excommunication leveled against the Patriarch Michael Cerularius and two other persons by the legate of the Roman See under the leadership of Cardinal Humbertus, legates who then became the object of a similar sentence pronounced by the patriarch and the Synod of Constantinople.
  • Supports

    Common Declaration of Pope Paul VI and the Patriarch Athenagoras Iparagraph 3

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: They had directed their censures against the persons concerned and not the Churches.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “1054: Rome and Constantinople excommunicate each other.” The sentences named persons, not churches (Common Declaration, paragraph 3); the kinds page now says the same. Raised by the denominations reviewer.

Claim 54 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 1095: Urban II preaches at Clermont. Five accounts of the speech survive, all written later,

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

The sourcebook now prints a sixth text, Urban’s own letter of December 1095, which is not an account of the speech.

Claim 55 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: and they disagree.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

How far they disagree is the crusades page’s reading of the five.

Claim 56 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 1096: Crusading bands passing through the Rhineland kill Jews before any army reaches the east. At Mainz the archbishop shelters them, and his men are the first to flee.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    Solomon bar Samson: the crusaders in Mainz, May 27, 1096, tr. Jacob MarcusMarcus’s headnote

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: As they passed through Germany on their way to Jerusalem this motley crew killed thousands of "infidel" Jews in the larger cities such as Speyer, Worms, Mayence [Mainz], and Cologne.
  • Supports · English (Krey 1921)

    The massacre of the Rhineland Jews, 1096: Albert of Aix and Ekkehard of AuraKrey pp. 54 to 56

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: He placed the Jews in the very spacious hall of his own house, away from the sight of Count Emico and his followers, that they might remain safe and sound in a very secure and strong place.
  • Supports · English (Marcus 1938)

    Solomon bar Samson: the crusaders in Mainz, May 27, 1096, tr. Jacob Marcustext, with Marcus’s note

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The bishop's men, who had promised to help them, were the very first to flee, thus delivering the Jews into the hands of the enemy. ... [Archbishop Ruthard had been paid to remain and defend the Jews.
  • Supports

    Crusades, in The Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 4I

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: To save the city from plunder Alexius Comnenus ordered them to be conveyed across the Bosporus (August, 1096)

What this does not establish

Albert has citizens of Cologne begin the killing there. That the bishop’s men fled first is the Hebrew account’s; Albert does not say it. Marcus’s "thousands" is a 1938 estimate.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “1096: Bands moving down the Rhine kill Jewish communities before any army reaches the east. A bishop shelters some of them and it is not enough.” Albert’s bands went up the Rhine, from Cologne to Mainz, not down it, and the Hebrew account has the bishop’s men flee first. Raised by the crusades reviewer.

Claim 57 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 1204: A crusade sacks Constantinople. The pope who called it condemns the sack in a letter the following year, and recognises the new order there.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    Crusades, in The Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 4V

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: On 12 April, 1204, Constantinople was carried by storm, and the next day the ruthless plundering of its churches and palaces was begun.
  • Supports

    Crusades, in The Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 4V

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: In his first Encyclicals he summoned all Christians to join the crusade
  • Supports · English (Brundage 1962)

    Innocent III: letter to the papal legate on the sack of Constantinople, 12 July 1205the letter, and its date

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: all the Crusaders who have remained to defend Constantinople from last March to the present ... whose swords, which they were supposed to use against the pagans, are now dripping with Christian blood ... Given July 12

    Defending the city since a March after its fall puts the letter in July 1205.

  • Supports

    Innocent III: letter to the papal legate on the sack of Constantinople, 12 July 1205Fordham headnote

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: Innocent first recognized and then embraced the new order in Constantinople.

What this does not establish

The sourcebook prints the day, not the year; the year is inferred from the letter. The order of his recognition and his rebuke is not settled by what was read, so the entry does not give one.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “The pope who called it condemns his own army in writing within months.” The letter is dated 12 July 1205, over a year after the sack of 12 April 1204. The crusades page also says he accepted what it won. Raised by the crusades reviewer.

Claim 58 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 1517: Luther writes ninety-five propositions about indulgences, and asks for a disputation.

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

Claim 59 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 1640s: The Westminster Confession answers a different question about scripture:

Kind
A church’s teaching. What the named tradition teaches, from its own documents. Evidence of what is taught, not proof that it is true, and not what every Christian holds.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
Held by
Reformed
  • Supports · English (OPC)

    The Westminster Confession of Faith, chapter 1: of the Holy Scripture1.9 and 1.10

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · The cited passage was read, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: The infallible rule of interpretation of Scripture is the Scripture itself ... The supreme judge by which all controversies of religion are to be determined ... can be no other but the Holy Spirit speaking in the Scripture.
  • Supports

    Confession and Catechismsintroduction

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: the Westminster Confession of Faith, Larger and Shorter Catechisms (1647)

What this does not establish

The source read dates the Confession and Catechisms together to 1647. The Confession speaks for the Presbyterian churches that adopt it.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “1646” No source the page cites gives 1646; the one it cites gives 1647 for the Confession and Catechisms together, and the page says "the 1640s".

Claim 60 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: not what kind of sentences these are, but who decides what they mean.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

The page’s contrast between Dei Verbum’s account of scripture’s truth and Westminster’s account of who interprets it.

Claim 61 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 1947: A shepherd finds the first scrolls near the Dead Sea,

Kind
Historical claim. A statement about the past that historical evidence can test.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
  • Supports

    The Dead Sea Scrolls: discovery and publicationDiscovery and publication, opening

    Cited · Link answered, 19 October 2026 · Read in full, 23 September 2026

    The source reads: only to be revealed by a young Bedouin shepherd in 1947.

What this does not establish

The details of the first find rest on the finders’ own accounts.

Claim 62 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: and a millennium of copying goes on trial.

Kind
This page’s reading. A judgement the page makes from the evidence. Others read it differently.
Review
A judgement, not a fact. Reviewed for whether it is fairly put and follows from the checked claims. No source can confirm it.

The exploration’s image for comparing the scrolls with the medieval text.

Claim 63 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 1965: A council states that what happened in the passion cannot be charged against all the Jews then alive, nor against the Jews of today.

Kind
A church’s teaching. What the named tradition teaches, from its own documents. Evidence of what is taught, not proof that it is true, and not what every Christian holds.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.
Held by
Catholic

What this does not establish

A Catholic council. It also grants that the Jewish authorities of the time pressed for the death of Christ.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “1965: The sentences of 1054 are revoked, and a council states that the passion cannot be charged against the Jewish people.” Split in two: the sentences of 1054 are on the kinds page, not on the page this entry indexes, and now have their own entry. The council’s words are "all the Jews, without distinction, then alive, nor ... the Jews of today", which "the Jewish people" blurred.

Claim 64 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit

Claim: 1965: The sentences of 1054 are lifted, removed "both from memory and from the midst of the Church".

Kind
Quotes a source. The words of a named text, checked against the source.
Review
Source checked. The cited passage was read, and it says this.

What this does not establish

The declaration lifts the sentences; it says itself that this does not end the separation.

Corrected

23 September 2026. Previously: “” Split from the Nostra Aetate entry so that each indexes the page that carries it.

Claim 65 · checked 23 September 2026 · AI-assisted audit