Skip to content

How much of you is you?

The ratio of bacterial cells to human cells was quoted as ten to one for forty years. Someone finally checked.

Shallowsdepth, meaning: Interesting questions with substantial evidence and real uncertainty remaining.Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.Inspect the question
00

The question

The ten to one figure came from a back-of-the-envelope calculation in the 1970s, repeated until it became a fact everybody knew.

The recalculation is a good demonstration of how a number survives without ever being checked, and of what checking looks like.

What is there

Known. Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.

Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.

About one to one

A 2016 analysis worked from measured concentrations and volumes: most of the bacteria are in the colon, which holds about 0.4 litres, not the litre of gut the older estimate multiplied by. Human cells are dominated by red blood cells, which are numerous and small.

The result for a reference adult is roughly 38 trillion bacteria to 30 trillion human cells. A 2023 recount of human cells came to about 36 trillion, which leaves the two numbers about equal. The ratio varies between individuals and changes after a bowel movement, which says something about the precision available.

By mass the bacteria are a fraction of a kilogram. The imagery of being outnumbered and overwhelmed was doing a lot of work that the numbers do not support.

What the recount changed

You are ten per cent human.
Roughly half your cells are bacterial, and by mass they are a small fraction of you.
The old figure was a measurement.
It was an estimate made in passing in the 1970s, cited for forty years without being recalculated.
The ratio is a constant.
It varies between people and within a person across a day.

They are doing real work

Gut bacteria break down complex carbohydrates the human gut cannot, some of them synthesise B vitamins, and colonisation shapes the adaptive immune system while it is developing. Mice raised germ-free develop abnormal immune systems, and they move more and behave less anxiously than mice carrying a normal gut community.

That much is demonstrated by intervention rather than inferred from correlation.

What a healthy one looks like

Before differences can mean anything, the normal range has to be known. A survey published in 2012 sampled 242 screened adults at up to eighteen body sites and sequenced what was there.

Its main finding was that the species present vary enormously between healthy people, while the metabolic functions those species perform are much more consistent.

That is part of why comparisons of species lists between sick and healthy groups have been hard to reproduce. Pooling ten obesity studies in 2016 found no consistent difference in the ratio of phyla everyone was quoting, and a classifier trained on one of those datasets was right about 57 per cent of the time on the rest. A 2024 analysis of 3,329 samples from seventeen countries reports a set of species that predicted obesity well in an independent dataset, so the signal may be real and small rather than absent. The stable quantity is what the community does, not who is in it.

A number can live for forty years on being repeated.

What it does

Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.

Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.

How much of health this explains

Differences in gut communities are associated with obesity, inflammatory disease, allergy, and depression. Association is where most of these results stop.

Transplant experiments in mice sometimes transfer a trait along with a community, which is stronger evidence, and mice are not people. Germ-free mice given the gut community of an obese twin gained more fat than mice given her lean co-twin’s. One systematic review found that 36 of 38 published transfer studies reported the phenotype crossing into the animals, and argued that a success rate that high is not plausible and overstates what the microbiome does in human disease.

Whether anything can be done deliberately

Faecal transplantation is an established treatment for one condition, recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, and that is the clearest clinical result the field has. One of the trials behind it was stopped early: 13 of 16 patients given donor faeces recovered after the first infusion, against 4 of 13 on vancomycin alone. For ulcerative colitis, trials suggest it may help, on evidence of low certainty.

Commercial probiotics are a different matter. Whether a strain settles in the gut at all varies from person to person, and in trials the effects depend on the strain and on the condition. In healthy adults, one review of trials found benefits for a few measures, stool consistency among them, and two found little sign of a lasting change to the gut community.

The evidence

Primary research, scientific institutions and archives. Links open at the publisher.

  1. Revised Estimates for the Number of Human and Bacteria Cells in the BodySender, Fuchs and Milo, PLOS Biology · August 2016
  2. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gutFlint and others, Gut Microbes · 2012
  3. Bacteria as vitamin suppliers to their host: a gut microbiota perspectiveLeBlanc and others, Current Opinion in Biotechnology · 2013
  4. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and diseaseRound and Mazmanian, Nature Reviews Immunology · 2009
  5. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behaviorDiaz Heijtz and others, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2011
  6. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiomeHuman Microbiome Project Consortium, Nature · June 2012
  7. Looking for a signal in the noise: revisiting obesity and the microbiomeSze and Schloss, mBio · 2016
  8. Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in miceRidaura and others, Science · 2013
  9. Establishing or exaggerating causality for the gut microbiome: lessons from human microbiota-associated rodentsWalter and others, Cell · 2020
  10. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficilevan Nood and others, New England Journal of Medicine · 2013
  11. Personalized gut mucosal colonization resistance to empiric probiotics is associated with unique host and microbiome featuresZmora and others, Cell · 2018
  12. The human cell count and size distributionHatton and others, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · September 2023
  13. Meta-analysis reveals obesity associated gut microbial alteration patterns and reproducible contributors of functional shiftChanda and De, Gut Microbes · 2024
  14. Gut microbiome-wide association study of depressive symptomsRadjabzadeh and others, Nature Communications · December 2022
  15. European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practiceCammarota and others, Gut · 2017
  16. Fecal transplantation for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseaseImdad and others, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · April 2023
  17. Strain-specificity and disease-specificity of probiotic efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysisMcFarland and others, Frontiers in Medicine · 2018
  18. A review of probiotic supplementation in healthy adults: helpful or hype?Khalesi and others, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 2019
  19. Alterations in fecal microbiota composition by probiotic supplementation in healthy adults: a systematic review of randomized controlled trialsKristensen and others, Genome Medicine · 2016
The currents

Where this question leads

See it on the map

Inspecting a passage

Loading the evidence record…