Skip to content

Where does the ocean’s plastic go?

Surveys of the sea surface found far less floating plastic than estimates of what enters the ocean implied. The gap has since been explained twice, in opposite directions.

Shallowsdepth, meaning: Interesting questions with substantial evidence and real uncertainty remaining.Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.Inspect the question
00

The question

The image of a garbage patch suggests an island. What the surveys find is a soup of fragments, and much less of it than the accounting predicts.

A missing quantity is not reassuring. Either the material is somewhere, or in some form, that has not been measured, or the accounting that says it went in is wrong.

What is measured

Known. Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.

Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.

The surface has been surveyed

A 2014 study synthesised net tows from a global circumnavigation and from other expeditions to produce a map of floating plastic and a first estimate of how much is there.

Debris concentrates in the five subtropical gyres, as ocean circulation models predict. That study put the load between 7,000 and 35,000 tonnes, for pieces from 0.2 to 100 millimetres in the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian oceans.

It is not the only figure. A 2015 synthesis standardised more than 11,000 net tows and ran three circulation models over them, and got 93,000 to 236,000 tonnes. A 2023 time series from 11,777 stations put the load in 2019 at 1.1 to 4.9 million tonnes, rising steeply since 2005, though its masses rest on one average weight per particle. The surface estimates now span nearly three orders of magnitude.

The accounting problem

Entering the ocean each year
millions of tEntering the ocean each yearEstimated in 2015 from waste generation and mismanagement on land. A 2023 model of buoyant plastic puts it near half a million.
Measured floating at the surface
thousands to millions of tMeasured floating at the surfaceFrom net tows. The published estimates, from 2014 to 2023, differ by nearly three orders of magnitude.
Unaccounted for
the differenceUnaccounted forSomewhere that has not been surveyed, in a form the nets do not catch, already broken down, or never there if the input was overestimated.

How much goes in

The other side of the accounting was estimated in 2015, by linking data on solid waste, population and economic status across 192 coastal countries.

The figure for a single year, 2010, came out between about 4.8 and 12.7 million tonnes. Population and the quality of waste management largely decided which countries contributed most, and without better waste management the cumulative amount available to enter the sea was projected to grow tenfold by 2025.

Set against the floating estimates of 2014 and 2015, the gap was not a rounding error. The 2015 synthesis put the standing stock of floating microplastic at around one per cent of a single year of input. Its authors noted that a stock and an annual flux are not the same quantity, and that the input counts plastics that never float, but judged that large debris outside the nets was unlikely to close two orders of magnitude. A 2023 model, with the 2015 synthesis’s lead author among its authors, found that items larger than 25 millimetres hold more than 95 per cent of the buoyant mass.

The smallest fragments are missing too

Plastic at sea breaks into smaller pieces under sunlight and mechanical stress, so the size distribution should keep rising towards the small end. In the 2014 surface samples it does not: abundance peaks at fragments of about two millimetres and falls away below one.

That is a specific and informative absence. Something removes the small fragments from the surface faster than they are produced.

The fragments get smaller until they reach a size the nets stop finding.

What is missing

Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.

Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.

Where it went

The candidates are that fragments sink once fouled by organisms, that they are eaten by animals and carried downward in faeces or in bodies, that they wash back onto shores, and that they degrade into pieces too small for the nets to catch.

In 2014 none had been shown to account for the bulk. The team that listed them judged a rigorous attribution not yet possible, and the washing ashore of millimetre fragments already trapped in the central gyres unlikely.

Two later lines of work each claim to close the gap. Extrapolating from samples taken across the Atlantic in 2016, one team put just three polymers, in particles of 32 to 651 micrometres, at 11.6 to 21.1 million tonnes in the top 200 metres, and concluded that the input estimates were too low. Extrapolating from one transect, a 2025 study put nanoplastics, smaller than a micrometre, at about 27 million tonnes in the mixed layer of the temperate and subtropical North Atlantic.

From the other end, a 2021 reanalysis argued that river fluxes had been overestimated by two to three orders of magnitude. A published comment called its conclusion fundamentally flawed, and the authors replied defending it. The 2023 model, assimilating surface, beach and deep-ocean data, put the input of buoyant plastic near half a million tonnes a year and concluded there is no missing sink. One account says the input was too high, the other that it was too low.

Which is right changes the hazard. Plastic sealed into sediment, large debris that lingers at sea for years, and nanoplastic spread through the water column do not reach living things in the same way.

What the harm is

Entanglement and ingestion are documented directly. A 2015 review of 340 studies recorded encounters between marine debris and 693 species, and plastic accounted for 92 per cent of the encounters. Effects at the level of populations, and the effects of the smallest particles on physiology, are far less clear.

A 2016 systematic review of the field counted 366 perceived threats from marine debris. Most of the ones that had been tested were demonstrated, but nearly nine in ten of those sat at the level of molecules, cells and tissues rather than whole animals or communities. Distinguishing what is established from what is assumed is unusually hard here, because the subject arrives already attached to a conclusion.

The evidence

Primary research, scientific institutions and archives. Links open at the publisher.

  1. Plastic debris in the open oceanCozar and others, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · July 2014
  2. Plastic waste inputs from land into the oceanJambeck and others, Science · February 2015
  3. A global inventory of small floating plastic debrisvan Sebille and others, Environmental Research Letters · December 2015
  4. The impact of debris on marine lifeGall and Thompson, Marine Pollution Bulletin · March 2015
  5. The ecological impacts of marine debris: unraveling the demonstrated evidence from what is perceivedRochman and others, Ecology · February 2016
  6. A growing plastic smog, now estimated to be over 170 trillion plastic particles afloat in the world’s oceans: urgent solutions requiredEriksen and others, PLOS ONE · March 2023
  7. Global mass of buoyant marine plastics dominated by large long-lived debrisKaandorp and others, Nature Geoscience · August 2023
  8. High concentrations of plastic hidden beneath the surface of the Atlantic OceanPabortsava and Lampitt, Nature Communications · August 2020
  9. Nanoplastic concentrations across the North Atlanticten Hietbrink and others, Nature · July 2025
  10. The missing ocean plastic sink: gone with the riversWeiss and others, Science · July 2021
  11. Comment on “The missing ocean plastic sink: Gone with the rivers”Mai, Sun and Zeng, Science · August 2022
  12. Response to Comment on “The missing ocean plastic sink: Gone with the rivers”Weiss and Ludwig, Science · August 2022
The currents

Where this question leads

See it on the map

Inspecting a passage

Loading the evidence record…