Skip to content

Where did Earth’s water come from?

Earth formed in a part of the disc too warm for ice, and it is covered in ocean. Hydrogen isotopes are one of the best ways of testing where it came from.

Shallowsdepth, meaning: Interesting questions with substantial evidence and real uncertainty remaining.Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.Inspect the question
00

The question

The inner solar system was too warm for ice when the planets assembled. The material Earth was built from has generally been presumed dry.

It is not a small discrepancy. There is enough water here to cover the whole planet to a depth of nearly three kilometres if the surface were smooth.

How it is traced

Known. Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.

Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.

Water has a fingerprint

A fraction of the hydrogen in any water is deuterium, a heavier isotope. The ratio depends on the temperature and conditions where that water formed, which is what makes it useful: the same measurement made on meteorites, comets and moons can say where each of them formed.

So the question can be asked as a matching problem. Earth’s oceans have a particular ratio; any proposed source has to have that ratio or be mixed from things that average to it.

Asteroids match better than comets

A 2012 study measured hydrogen isotopes in 86 primitive meteorites and found the water in carbonaceous chondrites distinct from the water in comets, with the hydrogen and nitrogen of the CI group suggesting it was the principal source of Earth’s volatiles. That implies their parent bodies formed in a different region from the comets, contrary to what recent dynamical models had predicted.

Comets have been measured one at a time, and the ratios differ between them by as much as a factor of four. The comet Rosetta reached in 2014 measured about three times Earth’s, and that brought its family into question as a source.

A 2024 reanalysis of the whole mission challenges that reading. Its authors find that ice on dust grains in the coma releases water far richer in deuterium than the nucleus, and that the ratio measured where the gas is well mixed is 1.2 to 1.6 times Earth’s, in line with the other Jupiter-family comets measured. A 2022 analysis of the same instrument’s data had found the ratio high and steady wherever the spacecraft was, and that is the result the reanalysis disputes.

Matching by isotope

Observed
Carbonaceous chondrites cluster near Earth’s deuterium ratio.
Inferred
Their parent bodies are a plausible source, and probably formed in a different region from the comets.
Observed
On the 2024 reanalysis, Rosetta’s comet measured three to ten times Earth’s ratio where dust affected the gas, and 1.2 to 1.6 times it where the gas was well mixed.
Inferred
If the reanalysis holds, the case against the Jupiter-family comets leaned on a dust-affected value, and it is open again.
Observed
Comet ratios vary from one comet to another by up to a factor of four.
Inferred
One measurement does not characterise a population, and the population is being sampled a few objects at a time.

The target of the match may have drifted for four and a half billion years.

What is unresolved

Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.

Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.

How much arrived late

Delivery by impacts after Earth had largely formed is one model: a small late addition of water-rich material from the outer solar system. Another has the water built in from the start. Enstatite chondrites, meteorites whose isotopes resemble Earth’s rocks, were presumed dry because they formed in the inner solar system; a 2020 study found enough hydrogen in them to have supplied at least three times the water in the oceans. And some may have come from the nebula itself, dissolved into an early magma ocean from a thick primordial atmosphere whose traces are still in the mantle, though one estimate puts that share at a tenth or less of the mantle’s volatiles.

These are not exclusive, and the mixture is what is being argued about. Much of the water may not be in the oceans at all: one mass balance puts up to nine tenths of it in the mantle, and work on core formation suggests the core took most of the planet’s hydrogen. The mantle’s hydrogen is also lighter than the oceans’, so matching the oceans tests only part of the inventory.

Whether the isotope argument is as tight as it looks

The ratio in Earth’s oceans today is not necessarily the ratio Earth started with. Hydrogen escapes to space preferentially over deuterium, and one model of an early hydrogen-rich atmosphere raises the ocean’s ratio by a factor of two to nine, which would mean the match with the meteorites does not by itself point to them. A 2026 calculation adds core formation, which it finds drew light hydrogen into the core and left the rest of the planet richer in deuterium.

Against that, a 2012 synthesis finds terrestrial hydrogen and nitrogen inside the meteorite range, and explains them by mixing two reservoirs without needing any escape fractionation. The matching exercise assumes a target that may have moved, and whether it moved is itself unsettled.

The currents

Where this question leads

See it on the map

Inspecting a passage

Loading the evidence record…