How many planets are there?
Until the 1990s the answer was nine, and every one of them orbited our star.
The question
The first confirmed planet around an ordinary star was found in 1995. Before that, the only planets known beyond this system’s orbited a pulsar, a spinning neutron star, where two were found in 1992.
What has happened since is less a discovery than a census, and like any census the hard part is counting what does not answer the door.
How a planet is found
Known. Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.
Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.
Two methods do most of the work
A planet crossing in front of its star dims it by a tiny, repeating amount. That is the transit method, and it requires the orbit to be lined up almost edge-on from here, which most are not.
A planet also pulls its star around a small orbit of its own, shifting the star’s spectrum back and forth. That is the radial velocity method, and it favours heavy planets close in.
Both are biased in known directions, which is what makes correcting for them possible.
What a detection actually is
- Observed
- A star like the Sun dims by about a per cent or less, repeatedly, on a fixed period.
- Inferred
- An object of a calculable size passes in front of it, once per orbit.
- Observed
- Spectral lines shift back and forth by metres per second.
- Inferred
- Something with mass is pulling the star around a common centre.
- Observed
- Neither, for most stars, most of the time.
- Inferred
- Nothing at all. Absence of a detection is almost never absence of a planet.
7 sources for this passage. Show them.
- How We Find and Classify ExoplanetsNASA Science · accessed 2026
- PlutoNASA Science · accessed 2026
- A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12Wolszczan and Frail, Nature 355, pages 145 to 147 · 1992
- Planetary Systems Composite ParametersNASA Exoplanet Archive · accessed 2026
- Transits and OccultationsWinn, in Exoplanets (ed. Seager), University of Arizona Press · 2010
- Radial Velocities as an Exoplanet Discovery MethodWright, Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer · 2017
- The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary SystemsWinn and Fabrycky, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 53, pages 409 to 447 · 2015
The correction is the result
Take the detections, divide by the probability that each kind of planet would have been detectable, and the answer becomes a rate rather than a count. Analyses of the Kepler survey’s Sun-like stars put the occurrence of small planets in modest orbits at a substantial fraction of stars.
Different teams working from the same data have reached different numbers, because the correction rests on judgements the data do not settle: how completely faint signals were recovered, how many of them are real, and how large their stars are.
3 sources for this passage. Show them.
- Terrestrial planet occurrence rates for the Kepler GK dwarf sampleBurke and others, The Astrophysical Journal · 2015
- The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary SystemsWinn and Fabrycky, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 53, pages 409 to 447 · 2015
- The Occurrence of Rocky Habitable-zone Planets around Solar-like Stars from Kepler DataBryson and others, The Astronomical Journal 161, article 36 · 2021
What the corrections cannot fix
Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.
Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.
How many are in the habitable zone
This is the number everyone wants and the one the data support least. It requires extrapolating from planets on short orbits, which are easy to detect, to planets on orbits of a year or more, which are not, and for many stars like the Sun the habitable zone lies beyond the longest orbit Kepler could detect.
Published estimates for how common such planets are differ by more than a factor of ten, and the spread is honest rather than sloppy: most of it comes from where the habitable zone is drawn and how far the data are stretched.
3 sources for this passage. Show them.
- Terrestrial planet occurrence rates for the Kepler GK dwarf sampleBurke and others, The Astrophysical Journal · 2015
- The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary SystemsWinn and Fabrycky, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 53, pages 409 to 447 · 2015
- The Occurrence of Rocky Habitable-zone Planets around Solar-like Stars from Kepler DataBryson and others, The Astronomical Journal 161, article 36 · 2021
What counts as a planet
The boundary with brown dwarfs is a convention rather than a discovery, and objects drifting through the galaxy with no star at all may outnumber the stars. The survey that counted them calls them planets; the IAU’s working definition does not.
Definitions are not facts about nature, and arguing about them is only useful when the argument changes what gets measured.
2 sources for this passage. Show them.
Absence of a detection is almost never absence of a planet.
What they are made of
Unknown. Humanity does not currently have a satisfactory answer.
Humanity does not currently have a satisfactory answer.
What most of them are like
The most common kind of planet found so far has no analogue in this solar system: larger than Earth, smaller than Neptune. The reading with most support is rocky cores wrapped in hydrogen, and some researchers argue for worlds rich in water. It is not settled, and the answer decides what the commonest planets in the galaxy are made of.
Their atmospheres are now measurable for a handful of favourable cases. A handful is not a census.
3 sources for this passage. Show them.
- The California-Kepler Survey III: a gap in the radius distribution of small planetsFulton and others, The Astronomical Journal 154 · 2017
- The Nature and Origins of Sub-Neptune Size PlanetsBean, Raymond and Owen, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 126 · 2021
- Transiting Exoplanet Atmospheres in the Era of JWSTKempton and Knutson, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 90, pages 411 to 464 · 2024
The answer, with its error bars
Possible. A hypothesis or interpretation worth examining, but not an established fact.
A hypothesis or interpretation worth examining, but not an established fact.
The number, stated carefully
Thousands are confirmed. The corrected rates imply that planets outnumber the more than a hundred billion stars in this galaxy, and NASA puts the total past a trillion. The uncertainty is a factor rather than a percentage.
That is a real result and it is not a precise one, and those two things are allowed to be true at once.
4 sources for this passage. Show them.
- One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observationsCassan and others, Nature 481, pages 167 to 169 · 2012
- How We Find and Classify ExoplanetsNASA Science · accessed 2026
- StarsNASA Science · accessed 2026
- Planetary Systems Composite ParametersNASA Exoplanet Archive · accessed 2026
The evidence
Primary research, scientific institutions and archives. Links open at the publisher.
- How We Find and Classify ExoplanetsNASA Science · accessed 2026
- Terrestrial planet occurrence rates for the Kepler GK dwarf sampleBurke and others, The Astrophysical Journal · 2015
- One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observationsCassan and others, Nature 481, pages 167 to 169 · 2012
- The California-Kepler Survey III: a gap in the radius distribution of small planetsFulton and others, The Astronomical Journal 154 · 2017
- Free-floating planet mass function from the MOA-II nine year surveySumi and others, The Astronomical Journal 166, article 108 · 2023
- PlutoNASA Science · accessed 2026
- A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12Wolszczan and Frail, Nature 355, pages 145 to 147 · 1992
- Planetary Systems Composite ParametersNASA Exoplanet Archive · accessed 2026
- Transits and OccultationsWinn, in Exoplanets (ed. Seager), University of Arizona Press · 2010
- Radial Velocities as an Exoplanet Discovery MethodWright, Handbook of Exoplanets, Springer · 2017
- The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary SystemsWinn and Fabrycky, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 53, pages 409 to 447 · 2015
- The Occurrence of Rocky Habitable-zone Planets around Solar-like Stars from Kepler DataBryson and others, The Astronomical Journal 161, article 36 · 2021
- The IAU working definition of an exoplanetLecavelier des Etangs and Lissauer, New Astronomy Reviews 94, article 101641 · 2022
- The Nature and Origins of Sub-Neptune Size PlanetsBean, Raymond and Owen, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 126 · 2021
- Transiting Exoplanet Atmospheres in the Era of JWSTKempton and Knutson, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 90, pages 411 to 464 · 2024
- StarsNASA Science · accessed 2026
Outward
Start where the Sun’s wind gives out and keep going until the question stops being about distance.
03 of 06This question is stop 3 of 6 on Outward, a route through the Ocean of Space.Where this question leads
- Ocean of SpaceIs anyone else out there?Shared ground: exoplanets.Deepdepth, meaning: Major unanswered questions.Read
- Ocean of LifeHow did life begin?Deepdepth, meaning: Major unanswered questions.Read
- Ocean of SpaceWhat is left when a star dies?Shallowsdepth, meaning: Interesting questions with substantial evidence and real uncertainty remaining.Read
- Ocean of SpaceHow will the universe end?Deepdepth, meaning: Major unanswered questions.Read