Skip to content

How high will the sea rise?

The central estimate for this century is well constrained. The upper end is not, and the reason is the ice sheets, Antarctica above all.

Shallowsdepth, meaning: Interesting questions with substantial evidence and real uncertainty remaining.Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.Inspect the question
00

The question

The IPCC rates it virtually certain that the sea will keep rising through this century, and for most of the contributions the amount can be projected too.

The uncertainty is not spread evenly across the projection. It is concentrated in the ice sheets, above all in Antarctica, and it sits at the top of the range.

What is measured

Known. Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.

Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.

It is rising, and the rate is increasing

Tide gauges and, since the early 1990s, satellite altimetry record a rise that has accelerated over the period of measurement. The two methods agree where they overlap, which matters because they measure from different places: a tide gauge reads the sea against the land it stands on, a satellite reads it from space.

The contributions can be added up independently: the ocean expands as it warms, glaciers lose mass, the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets lose mass, and the water stored on land changes. The sum matches the measured total within its uncertainties, which is a strong check on all of them.

It does not stop when emissions do

The deep ocean takes centuries to warm through, and ice sheets respond to a change in climate over centuries to millennia. Sea level in 2300 depends on what happens this century, and continues rising afterwards under every scenario.

This is a place where the usual framing of a target year is misleading. The commitment is long even where the rate this century is moderate.

What the range depends on

Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.

Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.

The Antarctic tail

Much of the West Antarctic ice sheet rests on bedrock below sea level, sloping downward inland. Warm water reaching the grounding line thins the ice, which lets the grounding line retreat into deeper water, which thins it further.

Whether that runs away, and how fast, is not settled. A 2016 model that added the collapse of tall ice cliffs and the fracturing of ice shelves by meltwater produced far larger contributions than earlier work; later studies have questioned whether the cliff mechanism operates as modelled.

The assessed likely range for 2100 is 0.28 to 0.55 metres under the lowest emissions scenario and 0.63 to 1.01 metres under the highest, measured from the 1995 to 2014 average. Those ranges leave out the ice-sheet processes that cannot be projected with confidence. Include them and the 95th percentile under the highest scenario is 2.3 metres by 2100. That figure carries low confidence, and a rise approaching two metres cannot be ruled out.

Where the uncertainty is

Observed
Thermal expansion and glacier melt, both measured, both driven by well-understood processes.
Inferred
Projectable with real confidence. Most of this century’s rise, under moderate scenarios.
Observed
Greenland losing mass at a measured and accelerating rate.
Inferred
A large contribution, with the physics of surface melting reasonably understood.
Observed
Marine-based Antarctic ice, whose unstable retreat has never been unambiguously observed.
Inferred
The widest part of the range, and the part that grows most after 2100. A process that either engages or does not, with very different outcomes.

Why a global number is the wrong question locally

Land rises and sinks, ocean currents pile water up in some places, and the gravitational pull of an ice sheet holds water near it, so losing ice in Greenland lowers the sea locally and raises it more than average far away.

The consequence is that some coasts will see substantially more than the global mean and some less, and planning from the global number is an error in both directions.

Losing ice in Greenland lowers the sea in Greenland and raises it in the tropics. Gravity is local.

The part the record is too short for

Unknown. Humanity does not currently have a satisfactory answer.

Humanity does not currently have a satisfactory answer.

Whether a threshold has already been crossed

Open. A question no research, historical or scientific or theological, has resolved to general agreement.

Parts of West Antarctica may already be committed to eventual collapse under warming that has already happened. The observational record is too short and the process too slow to tell from measurements.

A commitment that takes centuries to express itself is invisible to a satellite record that began in 1992, which is a limit on the question and not a reassurance.

On a route

The planet’s bad days

Ice at the equator, a mass extinction, the rhythm of the ice ages, two thresholds that may already be behind us, and the layer we are leaving.

05 of 06This question is stop 5 of 6 on The planet’s bad days, a route through the Ocean of Earth.
The currents

Where this question leads

See it on the map

Inspecting a passage

Loading the evidence record…