How high will the sea rise?
The central estimate for this century is well constrained. The upper end is not, and the reason is the ice sheets, Antarctica above all.
The question
The IPCC rates it virtually certain that the sea will keep rising through this century, and for most of the contributions the amount can be projected too.
The uncertainty is not spread evenly across the projection. It is concentrated in the ice sheets, above all in Antarctica, and it sits at the top of the range.
What is measured
Known. Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.
Strongly supported by evidence and broadly established.
It is rising, and the rate is increasing
Tide gauges and, since the early 1990s, satellite altimetry record a rise that has accelerated over the period of measurement. The two methods agree where they overlap, which matters because they measure from different places: a tide gauge reads the sea against the land it stands on, a satellite reads it from space.
The contributions can be added up independently: the ocean expands as it warms, glaciers lose mass, the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets lose mass, and the water stored on land changes. The sum matches the measured total within its uncertainties, which is a strong check on all of them.
It does not stop when emissions do
The deep ocean takes centuries to warm through, and ice sheets respond to a change in climate over centuries to millennia. Sea level in 2300 depends on what happens this century, and continues rising afterwards under every scenario.
This is a place where the usual framing of a target year is misleading. The commitment is long even where the rate this century is moderate.
What the range depends on
Uncertain. Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.
Meaningful scientific, historical or philosophical disagreement remains.
The Antarctic tail
Much of the West Antarctic ice sheet rests on bedrock below sea level, sloping downward inland. Warm water reaching the grounding line thins the ice, which lets the grounding line retreat into deeper water, which thins it further.
Whether that runs away, and how fast, is not settled. A 2016 model that added the collapse of tall ice cliffs and the fracturing of ice shelves by meltwater produced far larger contributions than earlier work; later studies have questioned whether the cliff mechanism operates as modelled.
The assessed likely range for 2100 is 0.28 to 0.55 metres under the lowest emissions scenario and 0.63 to 1.01 metres under the highest, measured from the 1995 to 2014 average. Those ranges leave out the ice-sheet processes that cannot be projected with confidence. Include them and the 95th percentile under the highest scenario is 2.3 metres by 2100. That figure carries low confidence, and a rise approaching two metres cannot be ruled out.
Where the uncertainty is
- Observed
- Thermal expansion and glacier melt, both measured, both driven by well-understood processes.
- Inferred
- Projectable with real confidence. Most of this century’s rise, under moderate scenarios.
- Observed
- Greenland losing mass at a measured and accelerating rate.
- Inferred
- A large contribution, with the physics of surface melting reasonably understood.
- Observed
- Marine-based Antarctic ice, whose unstable retreat has never been unambiguously observed.
- Inferred
- The widest part of the range, and the part that grows most after 2100. A process that either engages or does not, with very different outcomes.
5 sources for this passage. Show them.
- Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level riseDeConto and Pollard, Nature · March 2016
- Revisiting Antarctic ice loss due to marine ice-cliff instabilityEdwards and others, Nature · February 2019
- The West Antarctic Ice Sheet may not be vulnerable to marine ice cliff instability during the 21st centuryMorlighem and others, Science Advances · August 2024
- Ocean, Cryosphere and Sea Level Change (AR6 Working Group I, Chapter 9)Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change · 2021
- Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (AR6 Working Group I)Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change · 2021
Why a global number is the wrong question locally
Land rises and sinks, ocean currents pile water up in some places, and the gravitational pull of an ice sheet holds water near it, so losing ice in Greenland lowers the sea locally and raises it more than average far away.
The consequence is that some coasts will see substantially more than the global mean and some less, and planning from the global number is an error in both directions.
Losing ice in Greenland lowers the sea in Greenland and raises it in the tropics. Gravity is local.
The part the record is too short for
Unknown. Humanity does not currently have a satisfactory answer.
Humanity does not currently have a satisfactory answer.
Whether a threshold has already been crossed
Open. A question no research, historical or scientific or theological, has resolved to general agreement.
Parts of West Antarctica may already be committed to eventual collapse under warming that has already happened. The observational record is too short and the process too slow to tell from measurements.
A commitment that takes centuries to express itself is invisible to a satellite record that began in 1992, which is a limit on the question and not a reassurance.
3 sources for this passage. Show them.
- Marine ice sheet collapse potentially under way for the Thwaites Glacier Basin, West AntarcticaJoughin, Smith and Medley, Science · May 2014
- Unavoidable future increase in West Antarctic ice-shelf melting over the twenty-first centuryNaughten, Holland and De Rydt, Nature Climate Change · October 2023
- Ocean, Cryosphere and Sea Level Change (AR6 Working Group I, Chapter 9)Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change · 2021
The evidence
Primary research, scientific institutions and archives. Links open at the publisher.
- Ocean, Cryosphere and Sea Level Change (AR6 Working Group I, Chapter 9)Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change · 2021
- Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level riseDeConto and Pollard, Nature · March 2016
- Revisiting Antarctic ice loss due to marine ice-cliff instabilityEdwards and others, Nature · February 2019
- The West Antarctic Ice Sheet may not be vulnerable to marine ice cliff instability during the 21st centuryMorlighem and others, Science Advances · August 2024
- Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (AR6 Working Group I)Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change · 2021
- Marine ice sheet collapse potentially under way for the Thwaites Glacier Basin, West AntarcticaJoughin, Smith and Medley, Science · May 2014
- Unavoidable future increase in West Antarctic ice-shelf melting over the twenty-first centuryNaughten, Holland and De Rydt, Nature Climate Change · October 2023
The planet’s bad days
Ice at the equator, a mass extinction, the rhythm of the ice ages, two thresholds that may already be behind us, and the layer we are leaving.
05 of 06This question is stop 5 of 6 on The planet’s bad days, a route through the Ocean of Earth.Where this question leads
- Ocean of EarthWhere are Earth’s tipping points?Shared ground: ice sheets.Deepdepth, meaning: Major unanswered questions.Read
- Ocean of EarthWhat causes ice ages?Deepdepth, meaning: Major unanswered questions.Read
- Ocean of EarthAre we in a new epoch?Shallowsdepth, meaning: Interesting questions with substantial evidence and real uncertainty remaining.Read
- Ocean of EarthCan an earthquake be predicted?Shallowsdepth, meaning: Interesting questions with substantial evidence and real uncertainty remaining.Read